We strive to examine issues important to U.S. national security from a post-partisan perspective, meaning we try to break through the spin to find ideas we can use to encourage fresh thinking and build genuine consensus.
Are there enough seats at the table?
posted by Kelvin Lum on February 7, 2012 at 10:56 am
The talks between the Taliban and the United States must be about more than securing an exit plan. Afghanistan and Pakistan should be allowed to participate in these discussions and the talks must acknowledge Iran’s impact in the region. These moves would be a step in the right direction to creating a stable environment after US military involvement ends.
What we are reading
posted by Paul Hamill on February 6, 2012 at 2:38 pm
ASP ICYMI – Ashdown on Afghanistan, Egypt aid at risk, China and emissions… and more
What we are reading
posted by Paul Hamill on February 3, 2012 at 2:39 pm
ASP ICYMI – Afghanistan, Iran, Nuke Waste and Fusion
PAST EVENT: Entrepreneurship and National Security
posted by Paul Hamill on February 2, 2012 at 6:05 pm
The American Security Project (ASP) will host a lunchtime roundtable discussion on entrepreneurship and national security at 12:30 PM, Thursday, February 16.
What are we reading
posted by Paul Hamill on February 2, 2012 at 2:46 pm
Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran and Strategic Vision !
Nuclear strategy in the cyber age
posted by Harper Dorsk on February 2, 2012 at 2:40 pm
An article appearing in the most recent issue of the Air University’s Strategic Studies Quarterly (winter, 2011) draws a thick line from the nuclear age to cyber security.
