"*" indicates required fields

The Problem With Names-Based Lists

share this

From the White House summary of the Christmas bombing intelligence failures (summary_of_wh_review_12-25-09.pdf):

“A misspelling of Abdulmutallab’s name initially resulted in State Department believing he did not have a valid U.S. visa.”

I’ve been railing about this for a while.  But if anything makes the case for moving to a biometric identity assurance system, this has to be it, no?  It is 2010, and we’re literally still tracking people using methods appropriate to the 19th Century.

1 Comment

  1. How would that have helped?

    a. UFA applies for visa
    b. Submits to iris scan, finger-printing, visa approved.
    c. Someone says UFA is a threat…
    d. ???????

    Biometrics are on file, but you just have info re a threat, what are you going to match on?

Comments are closed.